Kháu-keng chèng-sû (hoat-lu̍t)

Kháu-king tsìng-sû (deposition (口供證詞); suan-sè tsìng-gên (宣誓證言); su-bīn tsìng-sû (書面證詞)) teh Bí-kok huat-lu̍t tang-tiong, hi̍k-tsiá Kanata huat-lu̍t tang-tiong ê tsìng-kì khai-sī sím-tsa, sia̍p-ki̍p tsìng-jîn suan-sè ê tîng-guā kháu-king tsìng-sû, tsia-ê tsìng-sû ē-tàng kán-huà tsò su-bīn pit-lio̍k, tshut-î tsìng-kì khai-sī bo̍k-tik, thê-kiong liáu-āu teh huat-tin sú-iōng. Teh Bí-kok hâm Kanata, kháu-king tsìng-sû tiānn-tiānn iōng-teh sòo-siōng. Sím-tsa tsha-put-to tsóng--sī teh huat-tîng guā iû lu̍t-su in tshin-tsū (親自) tsìn-hîng, bô huat-kuann tsāi-tiûnn lâi kàm-tok sím-tsa.[1][2]

Tsù-kái siu-kái

  1. Goldstein, Alan K. (1981). "A Short History of Discovery". Anglo-American Law Review. 10 (4): 257–270. doi:10.1177/147377958101000404.  Available through HeinOnline.
  2. Kessler, Amalia (July 2005). "Our Inquisitorial Tradition: Equity Procedure, Due Process, and the Search for an Alternative to the Adversarial". Cornell Law Review. 90 (5): 1181–1276. 15 April 2019 khòaⁿ--ê. 

Tsham-ua̍t siu-kái

  • subpoena duces tecum
  • subpoena ad testificandum
  • Section 1782 Discovery
  • HeinOnline

Guap-oo liân-kiat siu-kái