Ì-tô͘ (hoat-lu̍t)

Ì-tôo (huat-lu̍t) (tik-gú: Absicht, hi̍k-tsiá kiò-tsò bo̍k-tik ) sī Au-lio̍k huat-hē [en] hîng-huat tang-tiong tsit-tsióng ti̍k-sû ê tsú-kuan kòo-sîng iàu-kiānn, tsûn-tsāi teh tsi̍t-kuá-á ti̍k-tīng ê huān-tsuē, kiò-tsò ì-tôo-huān hi̍k-tsiá bo̍k-ti̍k-huān. Teh kòo-sîng iàu-kiānn tsân-tshù tang-tiong, Ì-tôo sio̍k-ú tshiong-hun tiâu-kiānn jî-hui pit-iàu tiâu-kiānn. Îng-bí huat-hētang-tiong ê 的 "huān-tsuē ì-sik" (mens rea) sui-jiân iah-ē hông huan-i̍k tsò "huān-tsuē ì-tôo", m̄-kù kah pún tiâu-bo̍k sóo kóng-tio̍h sī siong-ī ê khài-liām.

Khài-suat

Teh hîng-huat-ha̍k tang-tiong, "kòo-ì" (dolus) sī teh kóng huān-tsuē hîng-uî-jîn tuì kòo-sîng iàu-kiānn sū-si̍t kū-pī "ti" kah", tio̍h-sî hîng-uî-jîn jīn-ti kàu tsuân-pōoê khik-kuan kòo-sîng iàu-kiānn pīng iú-ì lâi si̍t-hiān, tse tō sī kòo-sîng huān-tsuē ê pit-iàu tiâu-kiānn (tû-hui sī kuè-sit-huān); tsì-u "ì-tôo" (Absicht) tsik-sī teh bóo tsi̍t-kuá-á ti̍k-tīng huān-tsuē tang-tiong, li̍p-huat-tsiá tsiam-tuì hîng-uî-jîn tsi tōng-ki bo̍k-tik gia̍h-guā tsing-siat ê ti̍k-sû iàu-kiānn, bo̍k-ti̍k teh hān-sok huān-tsuē ê sîng-li̍p. Lióng-tsiá sui-jiân lóng sī tsú-kuan kòo-sîng iàu-kiānn iàu-sòo, m̄-kù tsiân-tsiá tshik-tiōng teh hîng-uî sū-si̍t ê jīn-ti tsân-bīn, hiō-tsiá tsikn thé-hiàn teh hîng-uî sóo beh si̍t-hiān ê bo̍k-ti̍k-sìng tsân-bīn^[1]. Jî ì-tôo-huān ê sîng-li̍p , tû-liáu pit-su kū-pī guân-pún ê kòo-ì tsi-guā, koh-tsài tông-sî buán-tsiok ti̍k-tīng ê huān-tsuē ì-tôo, kòo-sîng iàu-kiānn tio̍h kiò-tsò "kai-tong" (該當).

Tsù-kái

↑ 柯耀程 (2021-11). "意圖犯意圖涵攝範圍之認定－評臺中地方法院 106 年度智訴字第 11 號刑事判決". 月旦裁判時報. 元照出版公司 (113期): 頁52-59. Goân-pún bāng-ia̍h Pó-chûn tī 2022-08-29. 2022-08-29 khòaⁿ--ê – via 法源法律網. (Hàn-gí)

Tsham-khó bûn-hèn

Claus Roxin [de]: Strafrecht. Allgemeiner Teil. (Band 1). 3. Auflage. Beck Verlag, München 1997, ISBN 3-406-42507-0, S. 366–371. (Tek-gú)
Johannes Wessels (Jurist) [de], Werner Beulke [de]: Strafrecht Allgemeiner Teil. C.F. Müller Verlag, Heidelberg, 41. Auflage, ISBN 978-3-8114-9822-8. (Tek-gú)

Tsham-ua̍t

Vorsatz (Recht)
Mens rea
Dolose Handlung (fraudulent act)

Guā-pōo liân-kiat

意圖--Legispedia (Hàn-gí)
意圖 - lawsWIK Archived 2022-10-30 at the Wayback Machine. (Hàn-gí)
本案例乃在闡釋故意，動機與意圖之區別 - Libra law center (Hàn-gí)
意圖與動機―評最高法院九十六年台上字第五九八號判決 (Hàn-gí)

[1] 柯耀程 (2021-11). "意圖犯意圖涵攝範圍之認定－評臺中地方法院 106 年度智訴字第 11 號刑事判決". 月旦裁判時報. 元照出版公司 (113期): 頁52-59. Goân-pún bāng-ia̍h Pó-chûn tī 2022-08-29. 2022-08-29 khòaⁿ--ê – via 法源法律網. (Hàn-gí)

[1]