Sell sò͘ Bí-kok àn
Sell sòo Bí-kok àn (ing-gú: Sell v. United States, 539 U.S. 166 (2003)) sī tsi̍t-hāng tshâi-kuat, kî-tiong Bí-kok tsue-ko huat-īnn tuì hā-kip huat-īnn hā-ta̍t bīng-līng, tuì pī jīn-tīng bô lîng-li̍k tsiap-siū uî-it sím-phuànn ê hîng-sū pī-kò kiông-tsè tsip-hîng khòng tsing-sin-pēnn io̍h-bu̍t ê kuân-lī. Bo̍k-tik sī hōo in ū lîng-li̍k pīng-tshiánn ē-tàng siū--tio̍h sím-phuànn. Kū-thé lâi-kóng, huat-īnn jīn-uî, kē-kip huat-īnn kan-na teh buán-tsiok ti̍k-tīng tiâu-kiānn ê iú-hiān tsîng-hóng hā tsiah ē-tàng án-ne tsò. Teh Charles Sell ê àn-lē tang-tiong, iû-î hā-kip huat-īnn bô-huat-tōo khak-tīng kám ū buán-tsiok huat-īnn ha-ling si̍t-si ê sóo-ū pit-iàu piau-tsún; in-tshú thui-huan tuì pī-kò tsìn-hîng kiông-pik ho̍k-io̍h ê bīng-līng[1].
| Sell sòo Bí-kok àn | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued March 3, 2003 Decided June 16, 2003 | |
| Full case name | Charles Thomas Sell, Petitioner v. United States |
| Citations |
539 U.S. 166 (more) 123 S. Ct. 2174; 156 L. Ed. 2d 197; 2003 U.S. LEXIS 4594; 71 U.S.L.W. 4456; 188 A.L.R. Fed. 679; 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Service 5131; 2003 Daily Journal DAR 6512; 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 359 |
| Case history | |
| Prior | Order granting permission to administer drug, United States v. Sell, No. 4:98-cr-177 (E.D. Mo. Aug. 9, 2000); affirmed, 2001 WL 35838455, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26009 (E.D. Mo. Apr. 4, 2001); affirmed, 282 F.3d 560 (8th Cir. 2002); cert. granted, 537 U.S. 999 (2002). |
| Subsequent | Remanded to district court, 343 F.3d 950 (8th Cir. 2003). |
| Holding | |
| Drugs to make defendant competent to stand trial may be administered involuntarily under very limited circumstances. | |
| Court membership | |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Breyer, joined by Rehnquist, Stevens, Kennedy, Souter, and Ginsburg |
| Dissent | Scalia, joined by O’Connor and Thomas |
| Laws applied | |
| U.S. Const. amend. VI, XIV | |
Tshú-tsiân, teh Washington sòo Harper àn[2] tsuè-ko huat-īnn bîng-khak tsí-tshut, kan-na teh siû-huān tuì ka-kī hi̍k-tsiá thann-jîn kòo-sîng huî-hiám; pīng-tshiánn tsi̍t-hāng io̍h-bu̍t hû-ha̍p siû-huān tsū-sin ê siōng-tuā lī-ik ê sî-tsūn, tsiah ē-tàng hā-līng kiông-pik huān-iú tsing-sîn tsìng-thâu ê siû-huān ho̍k-io̍h. Tshú-guā, tehsòo-tsu hui tsì-guān-sìng tsing-sîn io̍h-bu̍t tī-liâu tsìn-tsîng; huat-īnn pit-su siú-sian khó-lū "thè-tāi-sìng ê, khah-tsió tshim-ji̍p-sìng ê tshiú-tuānn"[2][1].
Ìng-iōng Riggins sòo Nevada àn[3] huat-īnn kiông-tiāu, kò-jîn kū-iú siū hiàn-huat pó-hōo ê "phiah-bián hui tsū-guān ho̍k-iōng khòng tsing-sîn-pīnn io̍h-bu̍t ê lī-ik"; lî-tshiánn tsit-tsióng lī-ik sī kan-na ū "ki-pún" hi̍k-tsiá "lîng-kà ê kok-ka lī-ik tsiah ē-tàng khik-ho̍k ê lī-ik".[1]
Tsù-kái
siu-káiTsham-ua̍t
siu-kái- List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 539
- List of United States Supreme Court cases
- Washington v. Harper
- Riggins v. Nevada
- Rennie v. Klein
- Chheng-kok hêng-chèng hoat
Guā-pōo liân-kiat
siu-kái- Text of Sell v. United States, 539 U.S. 166 (2003) is available from: CourtListener Google Scholar Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio) (Eng-gí)
- Court's Decision in Sell v. United States Reflects Psychology's Recommendation that Alternatives to Drug Therapy Should be Considered (Eng-gí)
- Amicus brief filed in behave of Dr. Sell by Association of American Physicians and Surgeons Archived 2012-07-04 at the Wayback Machine. (Eng-gí)
- A win for Sell, but not a complete victory (Eng-gí)
- State Can Make Inmate Sane Enough to Execute (Eng-gí)
- "Application of Sell v. United States -- Etheridge and Chamberlain 34 (2): 248 -- Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online". www.jaapl.org. goân-loē-iông tī 2011-09-28 hőng khó͘-pih. 2023-02-10 khòaⁿ--ê. (Eng-gí)
- Donna Lee Elm; Doug Passon, Forced Medication After U.S. v. Sell: Fighting Your Client's War on Drugs (PDF), Assistant Federal Public Defenders, D. AZ, goân-loē-iông (PDF) tī 2010-06-13 hőng khó͘-pih (Eng-gí)